Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 02890
Original file (PD 2014 02890.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2014-02890
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 20141118
SEPARATION DATE: 20070705


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SrA/E-4 (AFS 3E052/Electric Power Production Craftsman) medically separated for a protein deficiency. The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Air Force Specialty. He was issued a temporary L4 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The deficiency condition, characterized as “coagulopathy, protein c deficiency,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated “coagulopathy, protein C deficiency, with history of deep vein thrombosis” as existing prior to service (EPTS). The CI appealed to the Formal PEB (FPEB) and Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council, but the FPEB subsequently found the condition unfitting, rated at 0% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no further appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Please consider all conditions”.


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting coagulopathy (Protein C deficiency) condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any condition or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service Reconsideration PEB – Dated 20070504
 VA - (4.4 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Coagulopathy, Protein C Deficiency, with History of Deep Vein Thrombosis 7199-7121 0% Thrombophlebitis of Popliteal Vein, Left Leg 7121 NSC* 20070223
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Combined: 40%
Rated: 0%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 70802.
* Rated left lower extremity…protein C deficiency at 20% effective 20070706 (VARD 20100127)
ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Coagulopathy, Protein C Deficiency, with History of Deep Vein Thrombosis Condition. The narrative summary notes the CI was diagnosed with a hereditary coagulopathy disorder (protein C deficiency) following a deep vein thrombosis (DVT) of the left lower extremity (LLE) in December 2005. Notes in the service treatment record indicated that the CI had a similar episode of swelling and pain in the right LE in August 2005, but the ultrasound was interpreted as normal. Following the LLE DVT, based on the history of DVT, likely recurrent and the coagulation disorder, it was recommended that the CI stay on life-long anticoagulation. The CI was admitted to the hospital for evaluation of chest pain and shortness of breath on 8 January 2006; heart attack and pulmonary embolism (blood clots to the lungs) were both ruled out. At the MEB examination performed on 10 December 2006 (approximately 8 months prior to separation), the CI reported no concerns, other than the noted anticoagulation therapy. The MEB physical examination did not note any varicosities, swelling, induration, redness, warmth, discoloration, or dermatitis of either LE. Laboratory studies indicated abnormal levels of Protein C activity.

At the VA Compensation and Pension examination on 23 February 2007 (approximately 4 months after separation), the CI reported thrombophlebitis of the left leg. On examination of the bilateral LE pulses, strength, sensation, and reflexes were normal and there was no swelling, ulceration, or dermatitis. The examiner indicated that the thrombophlebitis of the left leg was resolved.

The Board directed attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The FPEB adjudicated the coagulopathy as EPTS, without permanent service aggravation coded 7199-7121 (post-phlebitic syndrome of any etiology). The CI appealed to the Secretary of the Air Force Personal Council, which found the condition was not EPTS, due to the development of symptoms which may have been contributed to by military activities. The coagulopathy condition was found unfitting, coded 7121, rated at 0%. The original VARD did not service-connect the “thrombophlebitis of popliteal vein, left leg.” The VARD dated 28 May 2009 indicated that a “clear and unmistakable error” had occurred and service-connected “Protein C deficiency with deep venous thrombosis of the left lower extremity,” rated at 0%, noting that the DVT had resolved, but anticoagulation was still required. The Board agreed that the evidence in record met the 0% rating IAW §4.104 (cardiovascular system), coded 7199-7121, specified as asymptomatic visible or palpable varicose veins and does not achieve the next higher rating of 10%, specified as intermittent edema of the legs or aching and fatigue after prolonged standing or walking, with symptoms relieved by elevation or compression stockings. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the coagulopathy condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the coagulopathy condition and IAW VASRD §4.104, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.
RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination.


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20140612, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record







                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAF/MRB
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:

 Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. §  1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2014-02890.
After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.
         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.
                                                               Sincerely,






 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
Record of Proceedings

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00559

    Original file (PD2009-00559.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    There were no trophic skin changes or evidence of stasis dermatitis.” Diagnosis was “Postphlebitic syndrome, left lower extremity.” The VA (near entry into TDRL) used essentially the same exams and history as the military and rated the CI’s DVT-related conditions as 7121 (Left Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis) at 10%, and 6817 (Bilateral Base Pulmonary Emboli Secondary to Deep Venous Thrombosis) at 60%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00864

    Original file (PD2013 00864.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SSGT/E-6 (3381/Food Service Specialist) medically separated for recurrent deep venous thrombosis (DVT).The CI reportedly had his first episode of DVT (a clot in a large leg vein), left lower extremity (LLE), in 1985. The Board determined that the DVT in either leg, in the presence of the requirement for lifelong anti-coagulation, was separately unfitting and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-01024

    Original file (PD2011-01024.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The conditions of history of deep vein thrombosis of the right and left lower extremities with post-phlebetic syndrome and chronic venous insufficiency as requested for consideration are the residuals that, IAW with the VASRD, should be used to rate the unfitting condition of heterozygous factor V Leiden deficiency and therefore they meet the criteria prescribed in DoDI 6040.44 for Board purview; and are addressed below, as part of the review of the rating for the unfitting condition. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01176

    Original file (PD-2014-01176.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Repeat examination on 27 June 2004 also recorded that there was no edema of the lower extremities. On examination, the left calf and both thighs were tender to touch, and several distended veins were felt on the left lower calf and right upper thigh.A Coumadin Clinic encounter on 9 December 2005, recorded the CI experienced muscle pain when he overdid activities such as standing too long or playing basketball. The CI complained of edema of the lower extremities relieved with elevation on...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02239

    Original file (PD-2014-02239.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The initial VA C&P examination (within the DES Pilot process occurred)dated3 June 2009, during the examination, the examiner noted that the CI was not currently in psychiatric treatment and during brief treatment for his MH symptoms in 2008 he was not hospitalized, was not suicidal and had not required any psychotropic medications.At the VA C&P examination the CI denied being anxious or depressedand the examiner noted the CI was “without signs of ongoing anxiety, depression, or psychosis at...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01644

    Original file (PD2012 01644.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the recurrent DVT hypercoagulation syndrome, necessitating life-long anticoagulant therapycondition as an impairment that was EPTS, but subsequently PSA, unfitting, rated 0%, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The PEB also determined the CI’s deafness to be not unfitting and not ratable.The CI made no appeals, and although he was eligible for transfer to the retired reserve he elected to be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00660

    Original file (PD2011-00660.docx) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam (nine months after separation), the physician noted intermittent symptoms of pain and edema in the LLE; although, DVT symptoms were not active at that time. In the matter of the hypercoaguability condition, the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011-00663

    Original file (PD2011-00663.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the pulmonary scans and pulmonary hypertension were improving, the CI had continued shortness of breath and had a diagnosis of chronic thromboembolic disease. The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated primary hypercoagulable state, on lifelong anticoagulation condition as unfitting (with contributing category II chronic thromboembolic disease and venous stasis) and the CI was rated at 40% and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). Exhibit C. Department of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01058

    Original file (PD-2013-01058.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DVT condition, characterized as “recurrent left lower extremity DVT,” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501.No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The Informal PEB (IPEB) adjudicated “deep vein thrombosis, left lower extremity with pulmonary embolism (resolved)”as unfitting, rated 20%. The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00157

    Original file (PD2009-00157.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chronic, Persistent Deep Venous Thrombosis/Recurrent Pulmonary Embolism/Hypercoagulable State requiring chronic use of anticoagulants: The CI served in the U.S. Marine Corps between 1987 and 1991 on active duty. VA treatment records revealed that in January 2009, the CI was admitted for another pulmonary embolism. Either condition alone would require Coumadin use.